From: Andrey Semashev (andrey.semashev_at_[hidden])
Date: 2020-08-24 17:32:27
On 2020-08-24 20:22, Peter Dimov via Boost wrote:
> Andrey Semashev wrote:
>> - It does *not* require the license to appear in the compiled
>> binaries, which may contain the data in binary form.
> It does. Without explicit permission (which the BSL contains for this
> very reason), binaries are derived works as much as script-processed
> files are.
I thought "copies" means copies of the source code, doesn't it? There is
also a latch that the license can appear only in the docs, not the data
itself, whether in source or binary form. I guess, that's what the layer
has to clarify.
But if it indeed means binary form as well then, alas, no Unicode in Boost.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk