From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2020-09-16 13:32:43
Rainer Deyke wrote:
> I vote to CONDITIONALLY ACCEPT Boost.JSON, conditional on the inclusion of
> code for parsing and serializing boost::json::value as CBOR.
The one interesting decision that needs to be made here is how to handle
CBOR byte strings (major type 3), as they aren't representable in JSON or in
the current boost::json::value.
I see that Niels Lohmann has added a "binary" 'kind' to the json value for
this purpose. Which would then invite the opposite question, what's a JSON
serializer supposed to do with kind_binary.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk