Re: [review][json] Boost.JSON review

From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2020-09-23 14:54:41

Vinnie Falco wrote:
> >   1. The memory management model is extremely simple. I wonder if 
> > storage_ptr could be moved somewhere else long term so other libraries 
> > can use it.
>
> This is something that has come up a few times, and I think it is worth 
> the review manager making a special note of it. For now I am content to 
> simply have an initial release of Boost.JSON where the storage_ptr system 
> is part of the library (which will be necessary for standalone anyway). 
> And we can see how the community feels about it, work out any possible 
> kinks.
>
> After some time for the thing to mature, we can measure support for 
> proposing it as its own library, or perhaps making it part of another 
> library.

How is this going to work in standalone mode?