From: Glen Fernandes (glen.fernandes_at_[hidden])
Date: 2020-11-06 15:33:02
On Friday, November 6, 2020, Edward Diener via Boost <boost_at_[hidden]>
> There has been no effort to merge the 'develop' branch of 'random' into
> 'master' and now the deadline for doing so has passed, at least for the
> beta release. Can anyone look into doing this and maintaining the 'random'
> library, at least for the future ? It is disappointing to me that my simple
> fix which would allow the Embarcadero C++ clang-based compiler to use Boost
> random will not get in the upcoming release, because it is the only Boost
> library of which I know for which my fixes to allow the Embarcadero C++
> clang-based compilers to work properly has not been applied for the 1.75
If someone is willing to contribute an Embarcadero C++ clang-based tester
to the Boost regression test matrix, it would probably make it easier for
maintainers to support this compiler going forward.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk