From: Mike (mike.dev_at_[hidden])
Date: 2020-11-27 12:36:16
> Gesendet: Freitag, 27. November 2020 um 13:26 Uhr
> Von: "Niall Douglas via Boost" <boost_at_[hidden]>
> On 27/11/2020 12:19, Vinnie Falco via Boost wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 27, 2020 at 12:58 AM Antony Polukhin via Boost
> > <boost_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> >> asio 18 -> 3?
> >> beast 19 -> 4?
> > Beast depends on Asio, so you will have to convince Christopher
> > Kohlhoff to go along with this idea for Asio.
> If I were Chris K, I'd respond "If you want to use Boost.ASIO with the
> standard C++ library, please go use Standalone ASIO. Boost.ASIO is
> specifically ASIO targeting Boost".
Whats the problem? Shouldn't that essentially just be a matter of tweaking
boostify.pl to replace fewer std types from the no-boost reference code
with boost equivalents than it currently does? Or is there more to it?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk