Boost logo

Boost :

From: Glen Fernandes (glen.fernandes_at_[hidden])
Date: 2020-11-29 20:19:39

On Sun, Nov 29, 2020 at 3:13 PM Adam Wulkiewicz via Boost
<boost_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> W dniu 29.11.2020 o 20:08, Glen Fernandes pisze:
> > On Sun, Nov 29, 2020 at 2:01 PM Adam Wulkiewicz wrote:
> >> W dniu 27.11.2020 o 00:53, Adam Wulkiewicz pisze:
> >>> I'd like to merge the following bugfixes and workarounds:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >> This is a part of the change I plan to merge. It only contains files
> >> from include directory. I extracted it for your convenience. I also plan
> >> to update tests and documentation but it's not required to ask for
> >> permission in this case. I pushed it to my repository instead of
> >> boostorg submodule to not introduce this temporary branch into the main
> >> repo.
> > These look like a lot of changes, and not all of them are new since
> > the beta release. (i.e. As if they should have been merged to master
> > before the beta but were forgotten). How much are fixes versus new
> > features that could wait until 1.76?
> All of them are bugfixes or workarounds. They were not merged sooner
> because the corresponding PRs were merged into develop after beta since
> they had to be reviewed. Look at the dates of "Merge pull request ..."
> commits.
> Technically this commit
> (
> introduces new, optional trait but without it there is a breaking change
> and I prefer to avoid releasing it as it is. After waiting long for
> reviews I briefly moved it to 1.76 but I went back to this breaking
> change while working on workarounds for Clang and assessed that the
> issue is potentially worse than I initially thought (see:
> This bugfix could wait
> but it looks harmless to me.
> Adam

Got it. OK to merge (all of them, including 42bd7cfe).


Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at