From: Antony Polukhin (antoshkka_at_[hidden])
Date: 2020-12-01 21:43:08
On Wed, Dec 2, 2020, 00:23 Glen Fernandes <glen.fernandes_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 1, 2020 at 4:16 PM Antony Polukhin.
> > Wich brings me to a less radical idea: we may simplify acceptance of
> dependenceless library clones. Next step would be to provide predefined
> bcp'ed subsets of libraries (boost 17, boost 23?)
> One option is for that other library (DLL for C++17+) to still live
> under the boostorg/dll repository - i.e. it doesn't need to have its
> own repository.
You mean folder structure like
Would the bcp treat dependencies of include/boost/dll17 separately from
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk