From: Mike (mike.dev_at_[hidden])
Date: 2020-12-02 14:06:00
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 02. Dezember 2020 um 11:18 Uhr
> Von: "Andrey Semashev via Boost" <boost_at_[hidden]>
> On 12/2/20 12:43 AM, Antony Polukhin via Boost wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 2, 2020, 00:23 Glen Fernandes <glen.fernandes_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> >> On Tue, Dec 1, 2020 at 4:16 PM Antony Polukhin.
> >>> Wich brings me to a less radical idea: we may simplify acceptance of
> >> dependenceless library clones. Next step would be to provide predefined
> >> bcp'ed subsets of libraries (boost 17, boost 23?)
> >> One option is for that other library (DLL for C++17+) to still live
> >> under the boostorg/dll repository - i.e. it doesn't need to have its
> >> own repository.
> > You mean folder structure like
> > include/boost/dll/
> > include/boost/dll17/
> > Would the bcp treat dependencies of include/boost/dll17 separately from
> > include/boost/dll?
> AFAIR, bcp operates on file level, so yes, it should be able to select
> individual headers used by some root source file, regardless of git
I believe this is true for the header files, but how would bcp know
which subset of source files to include?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk