From: Louis Tatta (louis_at_[hidden])
Date: 2021-01-12 01:50:55
Donovan has updated the website:
Remove 'Standard' field from each library info
Remove 'Standard Proposals' and 'TR1 libraries' from sort categories
Add 'C++ Minimum' to sort categories
Please let me know if you want any other changes.
On Fri, Jan 8, 2021 at 10:46 AM Edward Diener via Boost <
> On 1/7/2021 7:05 PM, Louis Tatta via Boost wrote:
> > Hello Edward,
> > I'm with the CPP Alliance. I'm working with Donovan to implement the
> > website changes and .'cxxstd'.
> > Reading the messages on the boost mailing list, we see some changes
> > requested and some asking not to implement the change. Can be a bit
> > confusing on what is needed or wanted.
> > Can we get a list of changes requested on the current implementation?
> The initial change has been done correctly, which is to provide a "C++
> standard minimum level" display field for each library which has its
> JSON field of "cxxstd" set to some value. I also have agreed with Peter
> Dimov's remark, which was also suggested earlier in this thread, that
> the "Standard" display field for each library should be removed, since
> it's meaning is obsolete and now also confusing. I have also suggested
> that if we are removing the "Standard" display field we should also
> remove the "Standard Proposals" and "TR1 libraries" sort categories,
> which are likewise obsolete.
> I personally think that since we now have a "C++ standard minimum level"
> display field it would also be nice to be able to have a sort category
> based on that display field called, let's say, "C++ Minimum".
> > Thank You
> > Louis
> > On Wed, Jan 6, 2021 at 6:16 PM Edward Diener via Boost <
> > boost_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> >> On 1/6/2021 5:44 PM, Peter Dimov via Boost wrote:
> >>> Donovan Dikaio wrote:
> >>>> The updates to show "C++ standard minimum level" is just live here:
> >>>> https://www.boost.org/doc/libs/master/
> >>> Looking at this, I think that we need to drop the "Standard" part. It's
> >>> mostly empty, the places it says things like "TR1" aren't helpful, and
> >>> it's easy to misinterpret it as the minimum required C++ level.
> >> I fully agree. Also the top line which give different views of the
> >> library documentation can probably drop the "Standard Proposals" and
> >> "TR1 libraries" views, since these are really obsolete by now.
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Unsubscribe & other changes:
> >> http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
> > _______________________________________________
> > Unsubscribe & other changes:
> Unsubscribe & other changes:
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk