From: Donovan Dikaio (dndikaio_at_[hidden])
Date: 2021-01-13 04:37:40
I have added a secondary sort by library's name for libraries which have
the same cxxstd value when sorting by 'C++ Minimum'.
It's up and available now here:
Please let me know if you have any more feedback.
On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 9:51 AM Louis Tatta <louis_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Hi Edward,
> Donovan has updated the website:
> Remove 'Standard' field from each library info
> Remove 'Standard Proposals' and 'TR1 libraries' from sort categories
> Add 'C++ Minimum' to sort categories
> Please let me know if you want any other changes.
> Thank You
> On Fri, Jan 8, 2021 at 10:46 AM Edward Diener via Boost <
> boost_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> On 1/7/2021 7:05 PM, Louis Tatta via Boost wrote:
>> > Hello Edward,
>> > I'm with the CPP Alliance. I'm working with Donovan to implement the
>> > website changes and .'cxxstd'.
>> > Reading the messages on the boost mailing list, we see some changes
>> > requested and some asking not to implement the change. Can be a bit
>> > confusing on what is needed or wanted.
>> > Can we get a list of changes requested on the current implementation?
>> The initial change has been done correctly, which is to provide a "C++
>> standard minimum level" display field for each library which has its
>> JSON field of "cxxstd" set to some value. I also have agreed with Peter
>> Dimov's remark, which was also suggested earlier in this thread, that
>> the "Standard" display field for each library should be removed, since
>> it's meaning is obsolete and now also confusing. I have also suggested
>> that if we are removing the "Standard" display field we should also
>> remove the "Standard Proposals" and "TR1 libraries" sort categories,
>> which are likewise obsolete.
>> I personally think that since we now have a "C++ standard minimum level"
>> display field it would also be nice to be able to have a sort category
>> based on that display field called, let's say, "C++ Minimum".
>> > Thank You
>> > Louis
>> > On Wed, Jan 6, 2021 at 6:16 PM Edward Diener via Boost <
>> > boost_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> >> On 1/6/2021 5:44 PM, Peter Dimov via Boost wrote:
>> >>> Donovan Dikaio wrote:
>> >>>> The updates to show "C++ standard minimum level" is just live here:
>> >>>> https://www.boost.org/doc/libs/master/
>> >>> Looking at this, I think that we need to drop the "Standard" part.
>> >>> mostly empty, the places it says things like "TR1" aren't helpful, and
>> >>> it's easy to misinterpret it as the minimum required C++ level.
>> >> I fully agree. Also the top line which give different views of the
>> >> library documentation can probably drop the "Standard Proposals" and
>> >> "TR1 libraries" views, since these are really obsolete by now.
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> Unsubscribe & other changes:
>> >> http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Unsubscribe & other changes:
>> Unsubscribe & other changes:
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk