From: Gavin Lambert (boost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2021-02-25 20:48:38
On 26/02/2021 8:58 am, Robert Ramey wrote:
> Right.Â Still it's only 5 tests.Â After tracking this down - which took
> a surprising amount of time given branches, etc - I considered my
> options and the easiest and most future looking was to just suppress
> these tests for compilations with C++ version <C++11.Â It's a good
> simple, expedient solution.Â I just needed an attribute to condition on.
> Â As chris pointed out I can condition one boost version.Â This is a
> practical and simple idea and I'll use it if nothing better comes up.
Conditioning a boost test on boost version < N is equivalent to just
unconditionally suppressing it, no?
Isn't the goal to only suppress it when not compiling >= C++11?
Shouldn't you just check __cplusplus >= 201103 for that?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk