Boost logo

Boost :

From: Rainer Deyke (rdeyke_at_[hidden])
Date: 2021-03-23 20:32:02


On 23.03.21 06:14, Vinnie Falco via Boost wrote:
> Is there any interest in having this proposed as its own separate
> Boost library (with a separate review, which has nothing to do with
> Beast)?

Better to have this out in the open than lurking in the belly of the Beast.

For me, the big question for a zlib derivative is where it stands in
relation to the original zlib in terms of bugs and security.

-- 
Rainer Deyke (rainerd_at_[hidden])

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk