Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: Eduardo Quintana (eduardo.quintana_at_[hidden])
Date: 2021-03-30 10:58:22

Next message: sayan chaudhuri: "Re: [Boost][GIL][GSOC21]Wish to know about code review process"
Previous message: Glen Fernandes: "Re: [release] 1.76.0 post-beta merges"
In reply to: Christopher Kormanyos: "Re: FFT proposal for gsoc 2021"
Next in thread: Stefan Seefeld: "Re: FFT proposal for gsoc 2021"
Reply: Stefan Seefeld: "Re: FFT proposal for gsoc 2021"
Reply: Christopher Kormanyos: "Re: FFT proposal for gsoc 2021"

(' ' encoding is not supported, stored as-is) I've written and uploaded a first draft proposal to GSOC-2021 for the
Boost.Math.FFT library.
https://github.com/Lagrang3/gsoc-2021/releases/download/v1.0/gsoc.pdf
I realize now that maybe I should have given more details about the proposal itself,
like user's interface and implementation ideas.
That can be fixed in version 2.0.

Best regards,
Eduardo

application/pgp-keys attachment: publickey_-_eduardo.quintana_pm.me_-_341e5416.asc

application/pgp-signature attachment: OpenPGP digital signature

Next message: sayan chaudhuri: "Re: [Boost][GIL][GSOC21]Wish to know about code review process"
Previous message: Glen Fernandes: "Re: [release] 1.76.0 post-beta merges"
In reply to: Christopher Kormanyos: "Re: FFT proposal for gsoc 2021"
Next in thread: Stefan Seefeld: "Re: FFT proposal for gsoc 2021"
Reply: Stefan Seefeld: "Re: FFT proposal for gsoc 2021"
Reply: Christopher Kormanyos: "Re: FFT proposal for gsoc 2021"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk