Re: FFT proposal for gsoc 2021

From: Kostas Savvidis (kotika98_at_[hidden])
Date: 2021-04-03 08:14:22

> On Apr 3, 2021, at 09:51, Eduardo Quintana via Boost <boost_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> 
> 
> ... is part of the motivation for having a general
> DFT instead just complex-DFT. Maybe the text it is not clear. You'll get the NTT
> for free.
>> 
>> See these two examples
>> https://github.com/Lagrang3/fftx/blob/master/examples/ex02.cpp <https://github.com/Lagrang3/fftx/blob/master/examples/ex02.cpp>
The example is a toy.
I replace int -> cpp_int which is the boost multi-int type and unsurprisingly it fails.
So much for templates allowing arbitrary genericity.

But if you think you can make it work, then you can add it to deliverables.
Otherwise, talk is cheap.

Cheers,
Kostas