From: Jeff Garland (azswdude_at_[hidden])
Date: 2021-05-01 15:50:58
On Sat, May 1, 2021 at 2:50 AM John Maddock via Boost <boost_at_[hidden]>
> Yes. Boost.Graph could do with a close look, in particular:
> * There are pull requests for new features which need reviewing by
> someone competent in the field.
> * The code base is rather ancient, and some careful modernization
> wouldn't go amiss.
> Thanks -- that's a good one since there's also now a standards proposal
for graph which cites boost.graph as a primary implementation. I assume
you have write permissions for the repo?
btw, one of the 'wander around' projects in my back pocket if I don't get
suggestions is to cleanup warnings -- especially in boost.locale. Everytime
I test a release candidate there are hundreds of them -- it's very
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk