Re: is_constant_evaluated

From: John Maddock (jz.maddock_at_[hidden])
Date: 2021-08-05 07:52:20

On 05/08/2021 01:53, Andrey Semashev via Boost wrote:
> On 8/5/21 2:14 AM, Gavin Lambert via Boost wrote:
>> On 5/08/2021 7:03 am, Andrey Semashev wrote:
>>> I might add that including <type_traits> just to test got a feature 
>>> macro is not good.

No need for that - we already include <version> (which is lightweight) 
and all that's needed in this case.  Both <version> and 
is_constant_evaluated are C++20, so you're very unlikely to have the 
latter without the former.

-- 
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus