Re: boost.spawn: review requested

From: Richard Hodges (hodges.r_at_[hidden])
Date: 2021-11-28 17:36:10

On Sun, 28 Nov 2021 at 18:30, Oliver Kowalke via Boost <
boost_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> Am So., 28. Nov. 2021 um 18:18 Uhr schrieb Andrey Semashev via Boost <
> boost_at_[hidden]>:
>
> > And if this library is not useful outside Boost.ASIO and
> > Chris is not interested, I just don't see the point.
> >
>
> another point:
> boost.asio still uses boost.coroutine which is deprecated and I really want
> to remove it from boost
> but is not possible because of boost::asio::spawn()
> boost.spawn is the alternative to asio's spawn() (which could be removed
> from boost.asio in favour of boost.spawn)
>

Asio's spawn is extremely popular and in use in a number of code bases. I
really don't think removing from boost is a sensible option unless there is
a clear, simple replacement that works for C++03.

>
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes:
> http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
>