Re: boost.spawn: review requested

From: Oliver Kowalke (oliver.kowalke_at_[hidden])
Date: 2021-11-29 15:03:48

Am Mo., 29. Nov. 2021 um 15:49 Uhr schrieb Niall Douglas via Boost <
boost_at_[hidden]>:

>
>
> For this to be valid as a standalone Boost library, in my opinion it
> needs to also support at the very least C++ coroutines if on C++ 20.
>

Sorry, but I think this does not make sense because boost::asio::spawn() a
boost.spawn do only support stackful context switching.
It was long discussed in the C++ standardisation meetings if a unified
syntax for stackless and stackful 'coroutines' is possible - the outcome
was, no its impossible (think on function coloring).