Re: boost.spawn: review requested

From: Andrey Semashev (andrey.semashev_at_[hidden])
Date: 2021-11-29 18:52:16

On 11/29/21 17:54, Boris Kolpackov via Boost wrote:
> Oliver Kowalke via Boost <boost_at_[hidden]> writes:
> 
>> I'd like to propose the new library boost.spawn [...]
> 
> FWIW (and I may be out of context), but "spawn" seems like a
> too generic of a name. I, for example, thought this is about
> posix_spawn(). Maybe call it spawn_fiber or some such?

+1