Re: boost.spawn: review requested

From: Oliver Kowalke (oliver.kowalke_at_[hidden])
Date: 2021-11-29 19:21:48

Andrey Semashev via Boost <boost_at_[hidden]> schrieb am Mo., 29. Nov.
2021, 19:52:

> On 11/29/21 17:54, Boris Kolpackov via Boost wrote:
> > Oliver Kowalke via Boost <boost_at_[hidden]> writes:
> >
> >> I'd like to propose the new library boost.spawn [...]
> >
> > FWIW (and I may be out of context), but "spawn" seems like a
> > too generic of a name. I, for example, thought this is about
> > posix_spawn(). Maybe call it spawn_fiber or some such?
>
> +1
>

As I answered posix_spawn() is wrong because the lib supports Windows too.
Boost.spawn already names the function spawn_fiber() ...
I don't get your point or what I've to change.

>