Re: boost.spawn: review requested

From: Andrzej Krzemienski (akrzemi1_at_[hidden])
Date: 2021-11-30 19:21:39

pon., 29 lis 2021 o 21:39 Oliver Kowalke via Boost <boost_at_[hidden]>
napisał(a):

> Am Mo., 29. Nov. 2021 um 21:30 Uhr schrieb Niall Douglas via Boost <
> boost_at_[hidden]>:
>
> >
> > As an alternative, how about announcing the complete removal of
> > Boost.Coroutine with two major release notice (including this release)?
> > That should spur Boost.ASIO being upgraded to Boost.Coroutine2.
> >
>
> That had already happen some years ago - including warnings during
> compilations - but didn't help. Ask Vini...
> At the end I was forced to remove the compiler (preprocessor) warnings.
>

Please correct me if I am wrong, but my understanding is that Boost.ASIO
works under C++03, and so does Boost.Coroutine. Whereas Boost.Coroutine2
requires C++11. If Boost.ASIO were to switch from BoostCoroutine to
Boost.Coroutine2, it would break its C++03 guarantee. (Some teams in my
work still have to use C++03.)

"Boost.Spawn" could be an addition to Boost.ASIO, but not a replacement,
right?

Regards,
&rzej;

> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes:
> http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
>