Boost logo

Boost :

From: Stefan Seefeld (stefan_at_[hidden])
Date: 2022-04-04 23:04:54

On 2022-04-04 13:43, Vinnie Falco via Boost wrote:
> Well, now that I have everyone's attention just before the release,
> I'd like to draw attention to the elephant in the room. That is, the
> declining level of activity on the Boost mailing lists and the
> declining level of participation in the Boost formal review process.
> Both in terms of the number of reviewers, and in terms of the
> difficulty in finding a review manager.
> Clearly, a website update is necessary and along with it some type of
> campaign to highlight once again the important role that Boost serves
> in the C++ community for both professionals and amateurs alike. But
> what more can we do?
> This came up before but it is worth mentioning again; in addition to a
> website update to make modern and relevant, how do we feel
> about a transition to forum-based discussion instead of the mailing
> list? I realize this will ruffle some feathers but surely the
> alternative, a descent into irrelevance due to steady declining
> activity is worse?

It stands to reason that a decline of participation (or development
activity in general) is somehow caused by the website not being
attractive or the communication requiring the wrong tools.

In fact, I remember numerous discussions all being misguided by the
underlying assumption that everything can be solved by new and shiny
tools. (What else would you expect from a bunch of engineers !?)

(For avoidance of doubt, I have nothing against a website overhaul or a
move to a different communication channel. But I strongly doubt that
this per se will have any lasting effect on the community.)


       ...ich hab' noch einen Koffer in Berlin...

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at