Re: nullptr vs 0

From: Ion Gaztañaga (igaztanaga_at_[hidden])
Date: 2022-05-24 21:17:37

On 24/05/2022 0:57, Peter Dimov via Boost wrote:
> Ion Gaztañaga wrote:
>> Well, I wasn't "literally" trying to define nullptr[_t], but a practical alternative
>> that is the same type as the standard one when available.
>>
>> BOOST_NULLPTR/boost::nullptr and boost::nullptr_t are more than enough
>> for portable code. Does it make sense?
> 
> But it's not possible to use boost::nullptr in portable code, because nullptr is
> a keyword.

Then BOOST_NULLPTR or boostnullptr macros are the only choice ;-)

Ion