Re: nullptr vs 0

From: Andrey Semashev (andrey.semashev_at_[hidden])
Date: 2022-05-27 11:00:56

On 5/27/22 05:14, Emil Dotchevski via Boost wrote:
> On Sun, May 22, 2022 at 3:35 AM Andrey Semashev via Boost <
> boost_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> I'd replace 0 with NULL. If the compiler keeps complaining report a
>> compiler bug and suppress the warning with a pragma.
> 
> I'm all for disabling useless warnings, but then you can leave 0 in the
> code and not bother with NULL. What are you, a C programmer? :)

It *is* a useless warning. The code with NULL is explicit enough and
portable, so what is this warning about? That the code is not
C++11-only? I know that, and it's not up to the compiler to tell me that.