Re: Boost.URL review

From: Zach Laine (whatwasthataddress_at_[hidden])
Date: 2022-08-24 19:23:11

Ship it.

Zach

On Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 2:02 PM Vinnie Falco <vinnie.falco_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 10:16 AM Zach Laine
> <whatwasthataddress_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> > For this case, I definitely prefer ref to view.
>
> \phew... progress :)
>
> So, to be explicit - does everyone agree that this set of container
> names is currently the best alternative thus far?
>
>      segments_ref
>      segments_view
>      segments_encoded_ref
>      segments_encoded_view
>      params_ref
>      params_view
>      params_encoded_ref
>      params_encoded_view
>
> Thanks