Boost logo

Boost :

From: Vinnie Falco (vinnie.falco_at_[hidden])
Date: 2022-08-24 23:42:26


On Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 2:44 PM Seth via Boost <boost_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Even though this is solliciting to become design-by-committee (there
> will never be full consensus) I will go on record that I think the `_ref`/`_cref`
> suffixes are reasonable to me. At least they're relatively short and consistent
> (ref/cref is a closer pair than mutable/const)

I prefer to think of it as "focus group sampling." This is on the table now:

    params_view
    params_const_view
    params_encoded_view
    params_encoded_const_view
    segments_view
    segments_const_view
    segments_encoded_view
    segments_encoded_const_view

Alan brings up a good point that while these are longer they are more
memorable and it leaves no doubt as to meaning.

Thanks


Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk