Re: Dropping C++03 support (again)

From: oliver.kowalke_at_[hidden]
Date: 2023-02-04 17:33:52

boost::spawn() from boost.asio depends on boost.coroutine. I've had suggested boost.spawn as a replacement for boost::spawn that depends only on boost.context.

04.02.2023 16:41:08 Klemens Morgenstern via Boost <boost_at_[hidden]>:

> Yes, with the next release beast will only rely on boost.context (including
> tests). Asio has also marked the functions using boost.coroutine as
> deprecated, so that it won't need boost.coroutine either..
> 
> If we do a boost 2.0 should we also try to unify things, i.e. make variant2
> the boost.variant in 2.0 etc.?
> 
> On Sat, Feb 4, 2023 at 11:08 PM Vinnie Falco via Boost <
> boost_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> 
>> On Sat, Feb 4, 2023 at 7:06 AM Andrzej Krzemienski <akrzemi1_at_[hidden]>
>> wrote:
>>> Do you mean specifically Boost.Coroutine (v1). We have
>>> Boost.Coroutine2 which appears to replace its v1 counterpart,
>>> and requires C++11. Or is there more to the story?
>> 
>> I am so sorry.. I meant Boost.Context (Klemens is this right?)
>> 
>> Thanks
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Unsubscribe & other changes:
>> http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost