Re: charconv for C++11

From: Dominique Devienne (ddevienne_at_[hidden])
Date: 2023-05-10 15:42:27

On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 4:01 PM Matt Borland via Boost <
boost_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> [...] We use errno rather than std::error_code as specified in the
> standard.

Hi. Sounded like a good candidate for Boost.Compat (or Boost.Polyfill),
discussed recently, until that sentence. I'm lucky enough to be able to use
C++17 at work, but if I was on C++11, I'd tend to use such a library until
I could use the std one, so deviations like this would complicate adoption
because moving to std would then be harder. My $0.02. --DD