Re: Boost.Compat

From: Glen Fernandes (glen.fernandes_at_[hidden])
Date: 2023-05-18 21:47:48

On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 5:31 PM Christian Mazakas via Boost <
boost_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> We could maybe solve the publicity issue by having the implementation
> become a typedef when the header is available.

I'm fine with this, but if we go this route it might be better that Compat
depend on no other Boost libraries.

e.g. They wouldn't be able to count on the  features of Boost.Assert.

>From my own experiences, this seems to be in line with what users actually
> want,
> where Boost's polyfills become their stdlib counterparts when available.
>

 Yes, this appears to be the increasingly prevailing desire.

Glen