Re: [boost.async] Seeking Endorsement

From: Vinnie Falco (vinnie.falco_at_[hidden])
Date: 2023-07-25 16:05:17

On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 9:00 AM Richard Hodges via Boost
<boost_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> The async primitives made available by this library makes this a logical,
> and pleasant-to-implement choice.

I can't speak to that because I have not used the library. And my
evaluation process considers more than the statements from one or two
individuals. I like to see it in an actual library or program whose
source code is published, where the author is accessible and I can ask
them questions about their experience with it.

Thanks