Re: [Async] Naming land grab?

From: Vinícius dos Santos Oliveira (vini.ipsmaker_at_[hidden])
Date: 2023-10-03 03:36:31

Em seg., 2 de out. de 2023 Ã s 13:18, Vinnie Falco via Boost <
boost_at_[hidden]> escreveu:

> Certainly, the naming of a library plays a significant role in its
> perception and utility. Here are ten alternative names that aim to be
> specific and descriptive, while avoiding a "land grab":
>
> Boost.Coroutinify
> Boost.Asiotasker
> Boost.CoAsio
> Boost.Yielder
> Boost.AwaitIO
> Boost.AsioGen
> Boost.FiberAsync
> Boost.Eventuals
> Boost.TaskifyAsio
> Boost.CoroutineX
>

I like the name AwaitIO for what Klemens had developed. FiberAsync is
definitely a no.

-- 
Vinícius dos Santos Oliveira
https://vinipsmaker.github.io/