Re: [Async] Naming land grab?

From: Niall Douglas (s_sourceforge_at_[hidden])
Date: 2023-10-03 07:09:24

On 03/10/2023 06:52, Klemens Morgenstern wrote:

> The solution Niall opted for is eager & lazy. I don't like adjectives
> as class names (similarly I don't like asio::awaitable) because that's
> a property of a thing. So imo they should be concepts or traits (e.g.
> is_eager), which is the case with async::awaitable.

That's not quite accurate. In Outcome I used:

`boost::outcome::awaitables::eager<T>`

`boost::outcome::awaitables::lazy<T>`

The enclosing namespace `awaitables` I think is rather important to the 
naming choices of "eager" and "lazy".

Niall