Re: [boost.async] new name

From: Richard Hodges (hodges.r_at_[hidden])
Date: 2023-10-12 03:48:01

On Thu, 12 Oct 2023 at 04:51, Klemens Morgenstern via Boost <
boost_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> Given the renaming requirement, I'd like to query the list if there
> are any objections to any of the following names:
>

Are we confirming acceptance of the names by not answering, or answering in
the positive?

>
> async.core
> await
> co_async / cosync
> co20 / cor20
>
>
FWIW, of these, cosync seems to me to be the most intuitive.

> Thanks,
>
> Klemens
>
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes:
> http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
>