Re: Do we still want develop branch?

From: Robert Ramey (ramey_at_[hidden])
Date: 2023-11-06 16:46:39

On 11/6/23 6:59 AM, Andrey Semashev via Boost wrote:
> On 11/6/23 12:45, Alexander Grund via Boost wrote:
>>

> To be clear, if Boost as a whole stops using develop, it doesn't
> prohibit you from having a branch like that; you can even name it
> develop, if you like. That is, if master is frozen, you are free to
> continue your work in other branches.

Thats what I would probably do.
> 
> Of course, you would be testing your changes against master branches of
> the rest of Boost. I suspect, it wouldn't make much of a difference in
> terms of the "stability" of the Boost release.

This is what I do on my local machine. I think it would make a 
significant contribution of the quality of the boost release.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
>