Re: The standard library is better documented

From: Niilo Huovila (niilo.j.huovila_at_[hidden])
Date: 2023-12-04 17:53:08

On 12/4/23 4:36 PM, Hans Dembinski wrote:
>> On 2. Dec 2023, at 16:57, René Ferdinand Rivera Morell via Boost <boost_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>
>> It would be useful if you could point to instances of Boost libraries
>> that could use better documentation.
> 
> Can we organise a user poll that ranks all Boost libraries on how well documented they are?
> 
> Might be a fun way to approach this and it provides an opportunity to create some publicity for Boost when we advertise this. I can see the news headline: "Boost devs finally respond to user cries for better docs"

The secret of cppreference seems to be that it is a wiki. How about 
that? Users could put their energy to improving the docs instead of 
complaining. :)