Re: The standard library is better documented

From: Mateusz Loskot (mateusz_at_[hidden])
Date: 2023-12-04 20:21:29

On Mon, 4 Dec 2023 at 21:05, Niilo Huovila via Boost
<boost_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> On 12/4/23 4:36 PM, Hans Dembinski wrote:
> >> On 2. Dec 2023, at 16:57, René Ferdinand Rivera Morell via Boost <boost_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> >>
> >> It would be useful if you could point to instances of Boost libraries
> >> that could use better documentation.
> >
> > Can we organise a user poll that ranks all Boost libraries on how well documented they are?
> >
> > Might be a fun way to approach this and it provides an opportunity to create some publicity for Boost when we advertise this. I can see the news headline: "Boost devs finally respond to user cries for better docs"
>
> The secret of cppreference seems to be that it is a wiki. How about
> that? Users could put their energy to improving the docs instead of
> complaining. :)

Users can already do that by submitting pull requests on GitHub.

Best regards.
-- 
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net