Re: (Important) Boost Foundation meeting this Wednesday

From: Ion Gaztañaga (igaztanaga_at_[hidden])
Date: 2024-03-12 07:41:05

El 12/03/2024 a las 2:39, René Ferdinand Rivera Morell via Boost escribió:
>> Is there any reason that the new web site could not be subjected to a
>> process similar to the formal process for new libraries?  This would
>> help build a consensus around functionality, design, etc.  I just don't
>> see any other way to be sure that all considerations are accounted for.

The main difference IMHO is that the mailing list is full of C++ experts 
that are probably terrible at design and usability ;-) Just look the 
aesthetics of our templated or preprocessor metaprogramming code!

Now seriously, not a formal review, but I think it's important that main 
issues (https://github.com/boostorg/website-v2/issues and 
https://github.com/boostorg/website-v2-docs/issues) could be discussed 
and monitored periodically (say, every 6 months) in the ML. Would be 
cpp.al folks fine with this approach?

Best,

Ion