Boost logo

Boost :

From: Alan de Freitas (alandefreitas_at_[hidden])
Date: 2024-03-12 16:24:00


>
> Now seriously, not a formal review, but I think it's important that main
> issues (https://github.com/boostorg/website-v2/issues and
> https://github.com/boostorg/website-v2-docs/issues) could be discussed
> and monitored periodically (say, every 6 months) in the ML. Would be
> cpp.al folks fine with this approach?
>

I don't think that's a bad idea, but unless things change I don't think it
provides a lot of additional value
over what we have now, which is already everything being constantly
monitored and people being able
to complain and open issues about anything at any time.


Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk