|
Boost : |
From: Vinnie Falco (vinnie.falco_at_[hidden])
Date: 2024-05-07 17:15:55
On Tue, May 7, 2024 at 6:33â¯AM Niall Douglas via Boost <
boost_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> I don't think the problem is getting a library into a fit state for
> standardisation,
but rather how library standardisation works at WG21 is not fit for purpose
> in
my opinion. In other words, the problem isn't a technical one, it's a
> _process_ and _political_ problem, in my opinion.
I agree with Niall here. The structure of WG21 creates perverse incentives,
producing outcomes which are not aligned with the needs of the wider C++
community. For example "the standard library can't connect to the internet."
Thanks
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk