|
Boost : |
From: David Sankel (camior_at_[hidden])
Date: 2024-06-06 22:54:22
On Fri, May 31, 2024 at 10:46â¯AM Sam Darwin via Boost <boost_at_[hidden]>
wrote:
> >
> >
> > Ugh... shouldn't this be boost.org ?
> >
>
> That's not a typo. The URL is archives.boost.io. In the past, the download
> link has been on many other domains: sourceforge, bintray, jfrog, and so
> on. There is no expectation the download is hosted on the website itself.
> Currently, 50TB/month of traffic are already going to archives.boost.io
> and
> would "break" (so to speak) if that were switched.
>
I agree that boost.org would be better. Where is the 50TB/month of traffic
coming from? We could make archive.boost.org point to the same server, no?
Having two domains for boost is just confusing IMO.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk