Re: Two mqtt libraries

From: Klemens Morgenstern (klemensdavidmorgenstern_at_[hidden])
Date: 2024-07-27 01:47:05

> >
> > It's been over a month, shall we schedule the double-review with us
> > both as review managers?\
>
> I don't think that having two review managers is a good idea.  Were we
> to disagree, it might lead to compromise which the current system
> avoids.  I also have a personal relationship with Takatoshi which might
> cloud my judgement or might lead others to question my objectivity.
> That is, I trust your judgement more than our judgement.  I CAN promise
> that if you take on the job of review manager of the two libraries, I
> will make a serious commitment to reviewing both - each in the context
> of the other.  That is, I will do what I can to make your life as easy
> as I can. I hope others can do the same.
>

Alright let me state it more clearly: I will not be the review manager
of redboltz/async_mqtt.
I have not volunteered for that.

I committed to be the review manager for mireo and I opted to wait
with scheduling their review as a courtesy for Takatoshi,
so the timing isn't the deciding factor. I do however think that a
very long delay becomes unfair towards the mireo team.

Unless we find a review manager for redboltz soo, I'd just stick to
the official rules and schedule a regular review for
mireo/async-mqtt5.
They've been pretty much ready for review since late April.