Re: Two mqtt libraries

From: Robert Ramey (ramey_at_[hidden])
Date: 2024-07-26 22:34:27

On 7/26/24 8:55 AM, Klemens Morgenstern via Boost wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 21, 2024 at 3:10 AM Robert Ramey via Boost
> <boost_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>
>> On 5/22/24 3:14 AM, Georg Gast via Boost wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Regarding the overlap: I don't think it would be a problem. This is already in boost. Statemachine and MSM. Serialization and JSON.
>>>
>>> Statemachine and MSM both serve the exact same purpose.
>>
>> Actually, that is the iconic example of the situation I'd prefer to
>> avoid.
> 
> It's been over a month, shall we schedule the double-review with us
> both as review managers?\

I don't think that having two review managers is a good idea.  Were we 
to disagree, it might lead to compromise which the current system 
avoids.  I also have a personal relationship with Takatoshi which might 
cloud my judgement or might lead others to question my objectivity. 
That is, I trust your judgement more than our judgement.  I CAN promise 
that if you take on the job of review manager of the two libraries, I 
will make a serious commitment to reviewing both - each in the context 
of the other.  That is, I will do what I can to make your life as easy 
as I can. I hope others can do the same.

Robert Ramey