Asset Stewardship Review

From: M P (miguelportilla64_at_[hidden])
Date: 2024-09-06 20:20:05

Here is my review of the proposed Boost.AssetStewardsipReview

## What is your evaluation of the design?

The C++ Alliance has laid out a solid plan for boosting Boost, covering
everything from revamping the website to improving integration,
documentation, and library support. They’ve clearly identified the main
issues and have offered practical, detailed solutions. They’re big on
involving the Boost community and stakeholders, encouraging feedback and
participation, and valuing everyone’s input. The Alliance is upfront about
potential challenges like delays and costs, but they address these issues
realistically. They’re not just offering quick fixes but are investing in
new tools and dedicated staff for long-term support.

On the flip side, the Boost Foundation’s concerns about the Alliance’s
transparency and use of paid contributions might come across as overly
critical. Sticking to slow decision-making and rigid governance could be
seen as a barrier to innovation. Their focus on a purely volunteer-based
setup might limit growth, and their critique of gender representation
doesn't offer clear solutions. Some of their proposals, like improving
mailing list behavior and adopting new tools, are a bit vague and might not
be enough to attract fresh contributors or more dynamic approaches.

## What is your evaluation of the implementation?

The implementation outlined in the text is well-organized and covers all
the essential bases for Boost's long-term success. The C++ Alliance has
already proven its value by setting up crucial infrastructure, like
continuous integration and IT support, and by contributing to various
libraries. The new Boost website is fantastic! Its modern design and
user-friendly layout make it easy to navigate and find what you're looking
for. With its fresh look and improved functionality, it's sure to catch the
eye of new users and make their first experience with Boost a great one.
Whether you're a seasoned developer or just getting started, the site’s
clean interface and accessible resources are a huge plus. Their plan to
revamp Boost’s brand and enhance its visibility is forward-thinking and
aligns with what the community needs. The proposal to have the Alliance
take on fiscal sponsorship aims to streamline operations and ensure
financial stability.

One thing to keep in mind is that the Alliance proposal comes with a legal
agreement where a Steering Committee, made up entirely of Boost authors,
gets to make decisions about the shared resources. If they're not happy
with how things are going, they have the power to move those resources
elsewhere. This kind of setup isn't mentioned in the Foundation proposal.
So, while the idea of the Alliance handling fiscal sponsorship could
definitely streamline operations and boost financial stability, how it
plays out will depend on how well the Alliance and Boost community work
together.

## What is your evaluation of the documentation?

The C++ Alliance proposal is easy to follow and straightforward, clearly
showcasing its contributions to Boost and laying out plans for future
growth. It does a great job of explaining the benefits of the proposed
governance changes and shows a real commitment to being open, sustainable,
and collaborative.

## How much effort did you put into your evaluation? A glance? A quick
reading? In-depth study?

I have dedicated considerable time to studying the proposals and related
documents, and I have been aware of the ongoing conflict for some time.

## Are you knowledgeable about the problem domain?

To some extent. With Boost's popularity declining in recent years, it's at
a critical crossroads, and its future success may very well hinge on this
decision.

## Do you think the C++ Alliance proposal should be accepted?

Yes

Miguel Portilla