Re: [optional] Feedback on the range interface for Boost.Optional

From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2024-09-16 11:57:13

Steve Downey wrote:
> What sort of changes are you anticipating? Opting out of std::format range
> formatting was one thing we discovered. Does boost jason have similar things
> for ranges?

Everything that does automatic range handling will potentially be affected,
e.g. hash_value.

Yes, Boost.JSON does this as well (provide a default implementation for range-
like things.)