Re: async-mqtt5 is CONDITIONALLY ACCEPTED

From: Kostas Savvidis (kotika98_at_[hidden])
Date: 2024-11-04 21:40:30

> On 1 Nov 2024, at 17:39, Christian Mazakas via Boost <boost_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> 
> Alright, seems like no one else has any strong feelings.

I would like to register opposition, for the future, to one of the arguments which was advanced by the RM:
that a recommendation to reject, based supposedly on the feeling that "the library should be something else" can be ignored or discounted.
I dont know enough about the particulars in this case, maybe reasonable in this case,
but I dont want to hear this argument in the future again.
If the reviewer is expressing that the design is flawed, that should be weighted on its technical merits.

Cheers,
Kostas