Re: async-mqtt5 is CONDITIONALLY ACCEPTED

From: Klemens Morgenstern (klemensdavidmorgenstern_at_[hidden])
Date: 2024-11-04 23:11:33

On Tue, Nov 5, 2024 at 5:41 AM Kostas Savvidis via Boost
<boost_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On 1 Nov 2024, at 17:39, Christian Mazakas via Boost <boost_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> >
> > Alright, seems like no one else has any strong feelings.
>
> I would like to register opposition, for the future, to one of the arguments which was advanced by the RM:
> that a recommendation to reject, based supposedly on the feeling that "the library should be something else" can be ignored or discounted.
> I dont know enough about the particulars in this case, maybe reasonable in this case,
> but I dont want to hear this argument in the future again.
> If the reviewer is expressing that the design is flawed, that should be weighted on its technical merits.

How would you evaluate the technical merits of such a review?

>
> Cheers,
> Kostas
>
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost