|
Boost : |
From: Christian Mazakas (christian.mazakas_at_[hidden])
Date: 2024-11-04 23:46:11
On Mon, Nov 4, 2024 at 3:11â¯PM Klemens Morgenstern via Boost <
boost_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> How would you evaluate the technical merits of such a review?
>
I'd ask myself if the person doing the review had joined the club of Asio
implementers like Niall and I.
Interestingly, Niall and I had a wonderful discussion about "reimplementing
Asio" (should be the name of the thread) but kind of surprisingly to me,
none of the resident Asio fans actually chimed in.
But back to it, the thing is, other people on the list had actually stepped
in and said that, "Hey, maybe a protocol lib is a good idea and worth
talking about".
Thomas Fowlery above noted:
> Meanwhile, the two rejections (and some non-review comments) brought up
major design questions which haven't been addressed by either the review
manager or the author(s). These facts make the outcome way less clear, in
my opinion.
This was a bad Boost review because the author of the proposed library
chose to ignore interacting with any and all "negative" discussion and the
review manager did the exact same.
There was no fostered discussion by the people who should've been fostering
it.
It mostly focused on me for dismissing a library for not hitting the level
of "interesting" that I use when evaluating a library for inclusion into
Boost.
I think what makes Boost so great is that we all have our own ideas of what
makes a library a Boost library. In this case, I think just implementing a
protocol in Asio isn't interesting enough to warrant being a Boost library.
Instead, I think a pure protocol library for MQTT is quite interesting and
would be worthy of the Boost moniker.
But what I think as an individual doesn't really matter. The point of Boost
and review is to foster discussion and toss ideas around about how feasible
it is to implement things.
In this case, my impression is that because the library was an Asio library
and because we like Asio, we'll just accept it. And that's basically
exactly what happened.
- Christian
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk