Re: Formal Review Retrospective

From: Darryl Green (darryl.green_at_[hidden])
Date: 2024-11-10 09:16:55

On Sun, 10 Nov 2024, 11:17 am Peter Dimov via Boost, <boost_at_[hidden]>
wrote:

> Vinnie Falco wrote:
> > Do note that this proposed "retrospective" took place anyway. The
> proposal
> > would just make it a bit more formal.
>
> There's no need to make it more formal. If people want to discuss it, they
> will.
>

Will they? I still feel like I would be an interloper in these discussions
even if I do belatedly look at slack because some hint was given that there
was something going on there? I am a regular slack (the platform, not
cpplang workspace) user but not in a context where just looking to see what
channels have been created and adding my 5c with in them would be
considered acceptable. You can take that, in itself, as feedback re a goal
I've seen stated somewhere; to increase and extend engagement in Boost in
general and reviews in particular.

>
>