Re: Formal Review Retrospective

From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2024-11-10 12:39:36

Darryl Green wrote:
> On Sun, 10 Nov 2024, 11:17 am Peter Dimov via Boost,
> <boost_at_[hidden]>
> wrote:
> 
> > Vinnie Falco wrote:
> > > Do note that this proposed "retrospective" took place anyway. The
> > proposal
> > > would just make it a bit more formal.
> >
> > There's no need to make it more formal. If people want to discuss it,
> > they will.
> >
> 
> Will they? I still feel like I would be an interloper in these discussions even if I
> do belatedly look at slack because some hint was given that there was
> something going on there? I am a regular slack (the platform, not cpplang
> workspace) user but not in a context where just looking to see what channels
> have been created and adding my 5c with in them would be considered
> acceptable. You can take that, in itself, as feedback re a goal I've seen stated
> somewhere; to increase and extend engagement in Boost in general and
> reviews in particular.

I don't think that any of this will be fixed if we mandate "retrospective"
post-review threads.