|
Boost : |
From: Vinnie Falco (vinnie.falco_at_[hidden])
Date: 2024-12-06 15:48:29
On Fri, Dec 6, 2024 at 7:33â¯AM Peter Dimov <pdimov_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> No, the public-facing design doesn't change. `BOOST_CXX14_CONSTEXPR` is
> replaced by the less ugly `constexpr` and that's pretty much it.
>
My next question is for those individuals who proclaim that requiring C++14
and later is ok. What is the specific rationale you used to determine
whether the loss of users is worth the benefit of "BOOST_CXX14_CONSTEXPR
replaced by the less ugly constexpr`?"
Thanks
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk